Corruption in Modern
China
It is
obvious that politic corruption in China has became a serious socio-political
problem. From the era of Jiang Zeming, and Hu Jintao to our new chairman Xi
Jinping, corruption has always hard to eradicate; many dignitaries use civil
revenues to fund their high quality of life. This kind of ugly news is often
reported in the newspaper. Some people show their strong discontent to the
whole society. And a small part of people think there is no matter those
leaders do these things in China. Officials’ corruption continues to be
exposed, and these officials were sent to jail. Are Chinese
leaders really serious about tackling with the political corruption? Or is this
a show? Therefore, I propose several reasons arguing that anti-corruption
is just a temporary stunt.
Corruption is totally widespread in the whole
world not only in China, so to speak. In China nowadays, the phenomenon about
corruption realistic. It is
just a fantasy that the government creates to make
people consider that the government can be incorruptible.
Sometimes, the leaders of China always do things with some sounded slogan, but
they cannot enforce on
it.
For example, the vice-chairman
of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress says, “When I think
of that there are 10 million people in Guang Xi province are still suffering
with poverty. As a chairman, I cannot sleep well.” Critically, the truth gives
an opposite view. He grafted about 40 million Yuan with his mistress. Moreover,
the ex-mayor Xiao Zuoxin from Anhui Fuyang city, said, “confronting corruption
is a long-term task for us. And we should insist on punishing the phenomenon of
corruption. Crackdown abuse of power for
personal gain.” However, the same evening,
he illegally received one million by abusing his social political status. These discourses seem
to never end, which demonstrate the best evidences to show that anti-corruption
is just a slogan. So in some ways, media as a kind of carrier, which conveys
information is “running dog” for the government. They were controlled by the
government to conceal these facts and leave us in the dark. Since Xi Jinping held the top chair last November,
he called for a stop to excessive banquets. The policy was named as “four dishes and a
soup.” Before the policy was put forward, the
problem of extravagance and
waste was very serious. Many officers used
public funds to have a excessive banquet. At the beginning, it is said that
this policy is quite effectual
in my hometown. Some time later, things went differently. Less people would
care about the policy. However, how long will this slogan make a effects? I do believe it is a small part
on the way to anti-corruption. It is compared to
the far greater challenge facing President Xi and his political peers in
stopping corruption in our public life.
On the other hand, governments focus
on the small problems but ignore the big issues on
purpose. They just deal with the corruption typically. There is a heap of
corrupt problems around them such as land expropriation,
cities and towns removal and state-owned-enterprises reform. However, they put
these things aside. Instead of this, they pay more attention to the
non-critical problems which can be solved easily.
Even now, they still make use plenty
of empty words in order to make all of us believe that they are good leaders.
They make contributions to the society. If they always solve problems in this
way, there is no way to eradicate
corruption. There is another
aspect of news which is reported recently in the newspaper. The deputy
head of transport of Sichuan province was sentenced to the death because of bribes.
On the contrary, it does not mention that the trial in Fujian province. It
was the biggest corruption case in 51 years of communist rule that involved a
trading company, with a multibillion-dollar smuggling and payoff
scandal amid deep secrecy in Fujian. This scandal has tainted members of the
elite ruling circle, among them, one of Jiang Zeming's relatives. The
government has used occasional prosecutions of high-level officials to show the
party’s determination to end rampant corruption that has eroded support for
communist rule. It is obvious that there are many people involved in this big
case. If people dig it out deeply, it will implicate more scandals.
Although there are many policies directed against
the corruption, the leaders of China, as the models of the whole society, have
responsibilities to give us confidence to trust them instead of trying
every means to cheat us. However, business, the main character in “Chinese
Corruption” always victimized during the fight with politics. Corruption is no
longer a kind of “latent rules.” On the contrary, anti-corruption become a new
“latent rules.” An official in Guangdong province who is examined, is shouting
to the examiners angry. He shouted, “You said that I am a greedy official, but the
main question is who is not a greedy official in the same level as me? In
China, the situation is just like greedy officials examining other greedy
officials with corruption promote corruption.” Since corruption in China is
rampant, the government gets to choose which corruption can put into public.
From 2003 to 2009,
prosecutors at all levels investigated more than 240,000 cases of embezzlement,
bribery, dereliction of duty, and rights infringement, according to the report.
From January to November, the Party's discipline watchdogs investigated 119000
graft cases, resulting in 113000 people being punished, of whom 4332 were
prosecuted, said Wu Yuliang, secretary general of the Central Commission for
Discipline Inspection of Communist Party of China, at a press conference. From
2005 until 2009, over 69200 cases of commercial bribery involving some 16.59
billion Yuan in funds were investigated, it said. In 2009, 7036 officials were
held responsible for serious mistakes, breach of duty, and failure to manage
and supervise subordinates. This task of curbing corruption remains
arduous. China has undergone dramatic economic and social change, and the ideas
and concepts of the people have altered, leading to increased social conflict.
So the relevant mechanisms and systems are still incomplete.
A great start. Can you format to look a little "neater?"
回复删除